Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Berfu Cengiz vs Mahak Jain Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Cengiz vs Jain analysis and find out who is favored!
Berfu Cengiz vs Mahak Jain Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Cengiz 2 - 0 Jain
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cengiz has won 46.77% of points on his second serve, while Jain has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cengiz, in recent form, has won 61.03% of his opponent's second serve points, while Jain has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.34% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cengiz has saved 54.66% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jain has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cengiz has won 48.21% of matches played (W/L 27/ 29), with Jain winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cengiz has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 96/ 55), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 69/ 61). Jain has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 68% (W/L 13/ 6), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Cengiz has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 47.06% of matches (W/L 24/ 27), where as Jain has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Cengiz winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Cengiz winning 4 and Jain winning 0. The last match between Cengiz and Jain was at the W25 Solapur, 03-12-2019, First, Hard with Berfu Cengiz getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:19:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Cengiz and Jain have played a deciding set 0 times, with Cengiz winning 0 times and Jain 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Cengiz winning 0, and Jain 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cengiz has played against opponents with an average rank of 325.84 while Jain has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cengiz has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jain has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cengiz has converted 50.19% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jain has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
347
Rank
228
High
24
Age
Plays
2
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
511
High
22
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
Form
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
58% (228-166)
Career Total W/L
59% (54-38)
63% (17-10)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$2,824
Career Prize Money
$600
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Berfu Cengiz | Mahak Jain |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 25 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:19:30 | 1:19:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (76/133) | 78% (101/130) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 63% (48/76) | 50% (50/101) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (27/57) | 45% (13/29) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (12/20) | 35% (6/17) |
| Return Points W% | 52% (67/130) | 44% (58/133) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Mahak Jain
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve %
76%
(
45 of
59)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
47%
(
25 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
| 6-4 7-5 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Mahak Jain
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
79%
(
56 of
71)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
0
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Berfu Cengiz | Mahak Jain |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (17/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (39/26) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (329/286) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 74% (14/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.08 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 24 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 74 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:57 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 322.67 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (1282/1917) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (774/1282) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (301/635) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 51% (125/245) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (950/2035) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 100% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 58% (14/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (17/27) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 55% (6/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (16/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (16/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 45% (11/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Berfu Cengiz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Francesca Curmi
83%
(
50 of
60)
1st Serve %
72%
(
31 of
43)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Fanny Stollar
60%
(
65 of
108)
1st Serve %
66%
(
75 of
114)
1
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
6
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
42 of
75)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
47%
(
51 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
51 of
114)
108
Total Points Won
114
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Gergana Topalova
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Nellie Taraba Wallberg
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
7
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
30 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Sandra Samir
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
52%
(
37 of
71)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
3
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Alison Van Uytvanck
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Jacqueline Cabaj Awad
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Priscilla Hon
Player
Berfu Cengiz
69%
(
68 of
99)
1st Serve %
69%
(
68 of
98)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
42 of
68)
32%
(
10 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
23%
(
5 of
22)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
47%
(
47 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
44 of
98)
96
Total Points Won
101
|
1-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Julia Riera
Player
Berfu Cengiz
65%
(
63 of
97)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
38%
(
37 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
94
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Kayla Day
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
92)
0
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
44 of
62)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
92)
88
Total Points Won
84
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Mahak Jain Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Amina Anshba
Player
Mahak Jain
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
91%
(
32 of
35)
3
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
55
Total Points Won
24
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Mahak Jain
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve %
76%
(
45 of
59)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
47%
(
25 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mahak Jain
Player
Humera Baharmus
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Diana Marcinkevica
Player
Mahak Jain
49%
(
20 of
41)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Mahak Jain
Player
Sada Nahimana
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mahak Jain
Player
Fiona Codino
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
63%
(
24 of
38)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
13 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
48
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mahak Jain
Player
Celestine Avomo Ella
82%
(
63 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
54%
(
34 of
63)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
45%
(
35 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mahak Jain
Player
Diana Maria Mihail
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
47%
(
25 of
53)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
45%
(
14 of
31)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
43%
(
20 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mahak Jain
Player
Anfisa Danilchenko
58%
(
11 of
19)
1st Serve %
47%
(
7 of
15)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
8 of
11)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Rtn Points Won
80%
(
12 of
15)
25
Total Points Won
9
|
6-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Mahak Jain
Player
Sada Nahimana
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Cengiz Vs Jain Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Berfu Cengiz
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
